News: Visit our Townhall Meetup site: http://townhall.meetup.com/99/
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 21, 2012, 04:26:36 PM
*

Recent

Your Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 04:26:36 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Statistics

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 40602
  • Total Topics: 5158
  • Online Today: 16
  • Online Ever: 252
  • (April 10, 2011, 07:49:21 AM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 14
Total: 14

Links

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Topic: Gahanna Stands Against Supreme Court  (Read 365 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« on: June 27, 2005, 12:04:24 PM »
RobertButler Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

WWW
*****
Reputation: +0/-0
Posts: 1015




Ignore

Gahanna Standing Against US Supreme Court
Libertarian Councilmen Propose ‘Eminent’ Ban

Gahanna City Councilmen Nick Hogan and John McAlister have proposed a ban on eminent domain abuse for the Gahanna City Charter. The US Supreme Court ruled last week that city governments were permitted to take away anyone’s private property if they expected to receive higher property taxes from someone else.

In New London, Connecticut, residents were forced to sell their homes to a private developer planning to build a hotel and shopping area. And in a similar case, homeowners in Norwood, Ohio were forced to leave in favor of a shopping mall and high-price condominiums.

“In light of the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 vote to attack private property rights, I believe it is absolutely necessary for Gahanna to stand up to be heard and counted,” declared Gahanna Councilman Nick Hogan, “we need to pass a law and better yet a Charter change to forbid anyone, including government, from taking one’s home for private development.

The Libertarian Party of Ohio has taken the lead on eminent domain abuse. “Not only do homeowners often receive free legal help,” mentions Ohio Director Robert Butler, “there's a complete package of eminent domain protest materials from yard signs to political strategies from www.castlecoalition.org

 “It’s a dark day for American homeowners. While most constitutional decisions affect a small number of people, this decision undermines the rights of every American, except the most politically connected. Every home, small business or church would produce more taxes as a shopping center or office building. And according to the Court, that’s a good enough reason for eminent domain.” Dana Berliner, a senior attorney who works with the libertarian, pro bono Institute for Justice and defended the residents of New London, Connecticut.

"All politics is local," notes Libertarian City Councilman John McAlister, "I agree with Nick that as a city council we should do everything possible to stand up to tyranny and look out for the rights of our constituents. We all took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, not Supreme Court decisions that try to take away rights rather than protect rights.”

“This is a litmus test,” challenges Libertarian State Chair Jason Hallmark, “If Republicans and Democrats won’t defend a person’s home, what good are they?”
 
Logged
In Liberty,

Robert Butler

Chair
Libertarian Party of Delaware County
www.lpdel.org
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2005, 12:14:37 PM »
dain Offline
Verified Member
CTH Professor

*****
Reputation: +1/-0
Posts: 3609




Ignore

And this appeared where?
Logged
"Men are qualified for civil liberties in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites....Men of intemperate minds cannot be free." [/i][/font] Edmund Burke
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines