News: Visit our Townhall Meetup site: http://townhall.meetup.com/99/
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 21, 2012, 05:34:57 PM
*

Recent

Your Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 21, 2012, 05:34:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Statistics

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 40602
  • Total Topics: 5158
  • Online Today: 21
  • Online Ever: 252
  • (April 10, 2011, 07:49:21 AM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 20
Total: 20

Links

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Topic: Income Tax Idea Floated By Columbus School Board  (Read 485 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: March 25, 2004, 10:34:50 AM »
TonyBlair Offline
Verified Member
CTH Professor

*****
Reputation: +54/-0
Posts: 3824




Ignore

We need to fight this HARD!  I say we start a letter writing campaign and attend some of these backward meetings.

Quote
INCOME TAX IDEA FLOATED BY BOARD
Columbus schools considering new ways to close budget gap
Published: Wednesday, March 24, 2004
NEWS 01B
By Bill Bush
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
The cash-strapped Columbus school district could turn to an income tax for help, the Board of Education said yesterday.

Board member Jeff Cabot asked Treasurer Jerry Buccilla to outline all of the district's potential revenue options, including adding an income tax.

Buccilla is to report back by April 22.

Cabot said he wants to know whether an income tax would move the tax burden to individual workers from commercial property.

"It may essentially be a tax shift from commercial and industrial to individual'' taxpayers, Cabot said.

In Franklin County, only the Canal Winchester, Pickerington and Reynoldsburg school districts have an income tax.

Before yesterday, the idea that an income tax could be tapped to close a deficit that could be as high as $85 million by next school year had not been publicly entertained by any board member.

The only new revenue discussed has been an operating levy, which would raise property taxes. Board members have said that likely would be placed on the November ballot.

"I just want to make sure we leave no stone unturned to look for every possibility,'' Cabot said after a special meeting of the board yesterday. "The question really is what the effect would be.''

A half-percent income tax would raise about $34 million a year for the district, equal to 3.8 mills of property tax, according to Gary Gudmundson, spokesman for the Ohio Department of Taxation.

A Columbus resident with an adjusted gross annual income of $30,000 would pay $150 a year on a half-percent income tax.

Like a property tax, an income tax would have to be approved by voters, and could be permanent or designed to expire afer a certain number of years.

Unlike property taxes, corporations don't pay school income taxes; people do.

"Certainly, it generates revenue from income (rather) than property, so I think it's pretty clear that it would shift the responsibility -- or the burden, if you want to call it that -- to wage earners,'' Gudmundson said.

And unlike municipal income taxes, which are paid by both residents and those who work in the municipality, only residents of the school district would pay this, Gudmundson said.

Anything taxed as income by Ohio, including pensions, annuities, capital gains and alimony, also would be taxed by the school district.

Social Security, disability pay, survivors' benefits, welfare, child support, gifts, inheritance, workers' compensation and railroad retirement benefits would not be taxed.

Asked why an income tax proposal hadn't surfaced until now, board President Stephanie Hightower said it is merely an attempt to be responsible by covering all options, and it "may be the shortest discussion we have at the table.''

A community committee has recommended that the Bexley school district ask voters to approve an income tax in November. The committee was formed after Bexley voters rejected an 8.75-mill operating levy last May.

The committee recommended a 0.75 percent income tax and the repeal of a 3.5-mill property tax, saying the district could have fewer or smaller levies and relieve the burden on residents living on fixed incomes.

bbush@dispatch.com
Logged
We could say [Democrats] spend money like drunken sailors, but that would be unfair to drunken sailors. It would be unfair, because the sailors are spending their own money.  --Ronald Reagan

Al Gore didn't invent the internet, he invented global warming

The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants - Camus

The person who advocates government planning of the economy always assumes that it is his plan that will be put into effect.  --Hayek
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2004, 02:32:47 AM »
Peter Offline
Administrator
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +13/-0
Posts: 1008




Agreed. Do we know when their next meeting is?  Is this being done at the City Council meetings?
 
Logged
It's the spending, stupid!
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines