CTH Public Relations

• Torture by CO2HOG [May 02, 2012, 10:19:42 PM]
• China by CO2HOG [March 31, 2012, 02:24:13 PM]
• Global Warming Watch by TonyBlair [October 09, 2011, 06:41:37 PM]
• Solar Panel Doubts by TonyBlair [September 02, 2011, 08:25:23 AM]
• Barack Hussein Obama, Emp... by TonyBlair [August 10, 2011, 08:57:54 PM]
• National Debt Clocks and ... by Counter [August 08, 2011, 10:30:42 AM]
• Scanner or Pat Down? by Vocal Observer [June 28, 2011, 01:09:51 PM]
• Rise of the Police State by Vocal Observer [June 28, 2011, 01:01:03 PM]
• Who can we trust? by Vocal Observer [June 08, 2011, 01:07:59 PM]
• Anthony Wiener's wiener i... by CarolinaBuckeye [June 01, 2011, 11:29:22 PM]
• Democrat's Culture of Cor... by TonyBlair [May 18, 2011, 06:55:46 AM]
• Hey Obama..You want Taxes... by Vince the Fox [April 21, 2011, 03:12:25 AM]
• Obama Policy Watch by TonyBlair [April 20, 2011, 06:56:14 AM]
• George W. Obama by TonyBlair [April 19, 2011, 06:11:57 AM]
• The Religion of Peace Upd... by TonyBlair [April 12, 2011, 06:43:20 AM]

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

Members

• Total Members: 329
• Latest: boborians

Stats

• Total Posts: 40602
• Total Topics: 5158
• Online Today: 21
• Online Ever: 252
• (April 10, 2011, 07:49:21 AM)

Users Online

Users: 0
Guests: 18
Total: 18

EducateWorthington.org

The 912 Project - Glenn Beck

912 Group of Central Ohio

Please let me know if you'd like your link added

[We could say [Democrats] spend money like drunken sailors, but that would be unfair to drunken sailors. It would be unfair, because the sailors are spending their own money. --Ronald ReaganAl Gore didn't invent the internet, he invented global warmingThe welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants - CamusThe person who advocates government planning of the economy always assumes that it is his plan that will be put into effect. --Hayek]

I've said it before...if you get your news from the NYT you are intellectually vacuous.  My standard line is: if it comes from the NYT, assume it is a lie until verified otherwise.

ON MARCH 8 the New York Times ran a lengthy profile of Donna Fenton. The story described how much difficulty she and other victims of Hurricane Katrina were having in getting assistance from government agencies.

On Thursday the Times issued this embarrassing correction after Ms. Fenton was arrested for grand larceny and welfare fraud:

"Prosecutors say she was not a Katrina victim, never lived in Biloxi, and had improperly received thousands of dollars in government aid.

"For its profile, the Times did not conduct adequate interviews or public record checks to verify Ms. Fenton's account … Such questions would have uncovered a fraud conviction and raised serious questions about the truthfulness of her account."

The rest is HERE.

With The NYT it is not a question of "either"  "or". Its both. Society has been experiencing a general decline in the work ethic.You don't find large numbers of dedicated workers anymore.The Reporting business has gotten soft and lazy.Much easier to gloam onto a "wire" story as opposed to doin a little gum-shoein...a little original investigation.Then compound an ideological driven agenda...and voila....crappy journalism as practiced by NYT and many others.

P G C

That was part of dinner discussion last night along w/the residency rule for political candidates that reporters ignore till one of their pet liberal officeholders appear to be on their way out.

Another fine example of BIASED Journalism in todays DISPATCH...front page above the fold:FIGHTING TO LIVE THE AMERICAN DREAM on the ILLEGAL Immigrants Rally Sunday. Type of "piece" that soccer moms in Arlington will love....Oh those poor hispanics just want to have the American Dream.....I'll bet 500 million Chineese and 200-300 Indians(subcontinent) would like to illegally move in too.

P G C

Did you read George Will's article on Sunday???

Columbus Dispatch Poll in Sunday's paper 3-26-06

    That Great polling operation known as The Columbus Dispatch was at it again.It would be nice if the Dispatch published the actual questionaire for us enquiring minds to evaluate and state clearly if the polling pool was with "likely" voters or with "registered" voters.(This was a little fuzzy in their explanation on how the poll was conducted) At any rate,the Dispatch's last pre-election poll was a COLLOSSAL  MISS the MARK and courtesy of BizzyBlog.com we have these details:

   

OK, maybe the Blissful Bunch is a bunch of partisan hacks comfortably secure in a university setting. But what explains The Columbus Dispatch’s poll of Oct. 24 through Nov. 3? It seems in reasonable order: 1,872 registered voters (note: NOT likely voters) and a 2.5% margin of error (again from Swing State; percentages sometimes don’t add up to 100% because of rounding):

Issue 2–Yes: 59%; No: 33%; Undecided: 9%
Issue 3–Yes: 61%; No: 25%; Undecided: 14%
Issue 4–Yes: 31%; No: 45%; Undecided: 25%
Issue 5–Yes: 41%; No: 43%; Undecided: 16%

The self-named “Central Ohio’s Premier Information Source” is eating crow by the kilo today. Even if you treat all Undecideds as “Nos,” the final “Yes” tallies were lower than the poll’s results wrong by 23, 28, 1 and 11 points, respectively.

   

In 30 years of following election results, I don’t think I have ever seen poll vs. actual differences like this. I’m not even sure I’ve ever seen differences of more than 10 points, let alone 28. They’re supposed to be getting better at this, not going into the toilet. I could have thrown darts and come closer than Bliss and the Dispatch did.

So it’s safe to say that until we see proof otherwise, polls taken in Ohio are worse than worthless, and in fact can be assumed to be at least 10 points off, if not more, in a Democrat and/or liberal direction.

   BizzyBlog....WELL SAID and WELL ADVISED

Puger Gee Calabalini