News: Check out Columbus Townhall's new bookstore: http://bookstore.columbustownhall.com/
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
September 09, 2010, 01:01:06 PM
*

Recent

Your Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 09, 2010, 01:01:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Statistics

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 40157
  • Total Topics: 5114
  • Online Today: 12
  • Online Ever: 163
  • (August 31, 2009, 08:30:33 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 12
Total: 12

Links

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Topic: 1st Amendment Watch  (Read 102 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: May 12, 2010, 11:52:11 AM »
Vocal Observer Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +10/-0
Posts: 1919




Ignore

Quote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Logged
Fan of:
The Principle of Subsidiarity
Progressive Libertarianism
Conscious Capitalism

Repeal the 17th Amendment:
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2010, 11:56:53 AM »
Vocal Observer Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +10/-0
Posts: 1919




Ignore

Incrementalism: Just a little snipping away of your rights until you're left with none.

Could someone consider you to be a terrorist?
Do you pose a threat to the current government?

Now that both sides of the isle are beating the war drum, who gives a damn about civil rights these days?

Obama Said to Be Open to New Miranda Look

Quote
WASHINGTON — David Axelrod, the top White House political adviser, said Monday that President Obama was amenable to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s call for a new law allowing interrogators to question terrorism suspects for lengthy periods without informing them of their rights.

In an interview on CNN, Mr. Axelrod said Mr. Obama was “open to looking at” changing the Miranda rule, which generally bans prosecutors from using as evidence statements made by suspects in custody before they have been warned that they have a right to remain silent and to consult a lawyer. “There may be some things that have to be done,” Mr. Axelrod said. “Certainly we’re willing to talk to Congress about that. But they would be in the area of adjustments, not a wholesale revision.”
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 12:11:36 PM by Vocal Observer » Logged
Fan of:
The Principle of Subsidiarity
Progressive Libertarianism
Conscious Capitalism

Repeal the 17th Amendment:
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2010, 12:17:39 PM »
Vocal Observer Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +10/-0
Posts: 1919




Ignore

Well, as long as it's for the common good...

Kagan Says ‘Governmental Motive’ is Proper Focus in First Amendment Cases, Backs Limits on Speech That Can ‘Harm’

Quote
In her article, Kagan said that examination of the motives of government is the proper approach for the Supreme Court when looking at whether a law violates the First Amendment. While not denying that other concerns, such as the impact of a law, can be taken into account, Kagan argued that governmental motive is “the most important” factor.
Logged
Fan of:
The Principle of Subsidiarity
Progressive Libertarianism
Conscious Capitalism

Repeal the 17th Amendment:
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC