Wednesdays at Cafe Daniela

I learned many things at this event. Thank you for hosting it. I was told to look at the facts and draw my own conclusion. I'd like to share my conclusion.

I have had some time to digest it. Please let me know if this sounds like a proper summary, or if it is off.

Man made climate change is a pure lie. There are 3 motivations for this lie.

The first motivaton was Margaret Thatcher's lie.
Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island events cause a public reaction and a moritorium on production of new nuclear power plants. Thatcher had the money to pay researchers to invent man-made global warming. The desired effect was to lift the moritorium so that new nuke plants could be built again for the sake of not contributing into the climate change. The unintended consequence is that a nuclear power plant is almost the twin of a nuclear weapon. If a country builds one, they can build the other. Thatcher's lie can actually give justification for arming nations that we do not want to have nukes.

The second motivation is Communism.
The commies saw Thatcher lying and took ownership of the lie as a thinly veiled propaganda tool that serves more to empower command economies than save a single polar bear's life. It is the nature of communists to use lies to promote their agendas. Thatcher was outmatched against this experience.

The third motivation is the Cult of Population Control
Underneath this all you can find a small element of people who would like to see the human population on the planet reduced to 100,000 or so people.

After these lies are burned away in the crucible, there are 2 things left to discuss. Lies must be enforced with threats, so there is the psychotic element of the hysterical public that must be considered. A psychotic tells lies, listens for those who offer proof that the lies are not real. Then the psychotic responds with even more lies and delivers a punishement to the person who exposed the lies for the world to see. Telling the truth about man-made climate change will beg the psychotic nature of the lie machine to punish you.

Finally, we are left with the only thing of value worth to discuss: a topic called "The proliferration of weapons" All other forms of the man-made climate change debate are simply distractions away from this issue that rightfully deserves all of this misguided attention.

So that is my take on what I learned. After using what I know from this event, my opinion has shaped into this form. Nobody mentioned weapons, but we are allowed to use the facts to draw our own conclusions. This is my conclusion.

Recent

Your Info

Statistics

Members

Stats

Users Online

Links