"Senators do not represent the state, but the people of the state"
The corollary here is that the State is not the people or that by representing the people of a state the senator is not representing the State. It presuposes that the wisdom of the legislature is greater than the wisdom of the people.
Considering the Ohio Legislature over the years and the gerrymandering of districts, that is a bad joke. The 17th amendment should stand. Power to the people where all are equal (Senators are elected at large)
'composed of eloquent advocates, distinguished generals, wise magistrates, and statesmen of note, whose arguments would do honor to the most remarkable parliamentary debates of Europe."
With the anti-intellectualism that is rampant the people would regard such eloquence as "out of touch".
Not to be cynical but the old axiom that says that "the people do not get the government they want but rather the government they deserve" was true in the past, more so in the last eight years and if things keep going the way they are going now it will be true for the foreseeable future. The infighting, the one upsmanship, the lack of civility, the lack of humility, the lack of civil morality and cohesiveness will place this country at greater risk than it faces now.
"My way or the highway" is not conducive to civil tranquility.
"Times have definitely changed"
But for the best. Women have the vote, slavery has been abolished etc. etc.
The Constitution contemplates methods for its amendment because the founding fathers must have recognized that life of people and nations are not static. The people can (and will from time to time) through their elected representatives change the constitution. Such amendments be they to the US or State constitutions should be carefully considered and not used for the establishment of casinos

The Shadow