Is this just a coincidence that the economy grows faster under Democrats than Republicans? Is all of it just a delayed reaction to Eisenhower's policies?
That is a large part of it. FDR came in at the bottom of a Depressions and was saved by WWII. Truman got the explosion of buying after the GIs returned home. JFK cut taxes. Nixon used price fixing, and passed OSHA and EPA which killed his economy. President Bush I raised taxes and had a oil price shock. Bill Clinton inherited peace and prosperity and still couldn't keep the economy afloat, and needed a Republican Congress to save him. President Bush II inherited the worst stock market crash, dot com bust, recession since 1974, then had 911 and had to stop the fall and reverse the downfall.
What is it that Republicans do or don't do to slow down growth?
1) Supply-side vs demand side economics
2) cut vs increase taxes
3) cut vs increase spending in nonrecessionary times
4) deregulate vs regulate
5) feed the golden goose of our economy business
6) understand the importance of energy and strive to maintain constant reliable supplies
7) Privatizaton vs socialization
What is that Democrats do or don't do to speed up growth?.
1) Increase regulations and costs
2) Increase taxes on the golden geese of our society
3) Increase spending in unproductive areas
4) Block drilling
5) Waste money on nonsense on things like stem cells and global warming.
6) Openly attack huge parts of our economy big oil, big pharma, big tobacco, big healthcare, big auto with their regulations and pro-union stance. big insurance.
Is it just bad luck?
Part, but then WWII helped their numbers out a whole hell of a lot, and that wasn't planned by the Democrats.
Presidents And The Stock Market
Management consultant Peter Cohan says investors have poor expectations of Democrats, so once the Democrats are in power, stocks rise in relief "when it turns out they don't screw up the economy."
http://www.forbes.com/2004/07/21/cx_da_0721presidents.html