News: Check out Columbus Townhall's new bookstore: http://bookstore.columbustownhall.com/
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 23, 2012, 11:05:06 AM
*

Recent

Your Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 11:05:06 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Statistics

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 40602
  • Total Topics: 5158
  • Online Today: 18
  • Online Ever: 252
  • (April 10, 2011, 07:49:21 AM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 18
Total: 18

Links

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Topic: Issue 2: Casino  (Read 690 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: April 29, 2010, 03:56:23 PM »
Vocal Observer Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +18/-0
Posts: 1971




Ignore

There hasn't been any talk of Issue 2 here.  I was recently e-mailed by one of my neighbors who was surprised that I am opposed to the issue.  Here's my response:

Quote
I've been opposed to every casino issue that has come up on the ballot.  I am not completely opposed to casinos; however, the way in which they've gone about it in Ohio epitomizes the accepted corruption that exists in the state. Theses casino issues predetermine the winners and losers and essentially allow for non-residents of Franklin County to decide our affairs.  If gamers want to come into the state, there should be a ballot issue to legalize this, nothing more.  Afterward, individual communities can vote on this if they feel that it's in their best interest.

As to my specific opposition to Issue 2, I believe the Gaming Company has already made arrangements to move to the new location.  By voting NO, if nothing else, this further delays gamers from coming into our community.  I believe a vote of NO will stick them between a rock and a hard place, hopefully killing the deal entirely.  I believe this is our last hope to stop them and I believe a vote of yes paves the way for them to open business.  So as you can see, I'm still fighting.

(in reference to story below)...it's not about principle with the politicians; it's only about money.  The trustees of Franklin Township are willing to sell out to the casino and the city if the price is right.  I don't believe it's morally right for me to vote to put the casino in Franklin Township just as much as I thought it was wrong for non-residents of Franklin County to vote to bring it here in the first place.


Deal annexes casino into city; Franklin Township gets $67M

Quote
Columbus will annex the potential West Side casino site and give Franklin Township $67 million over the next 50 years under a tentative agreement rolled out this afternoon.

Money generated by the complicated deal would be spread over much of the West Side, concentrating on the Broad Street corridor, regardless of whether the property is in the city or township, said Mayor Michael B. Coleman and Timothy Guyton, chairman of the township's trustees.

Under the proposed agreement, Columbus would annex no township land for the next 50 years in an area stretching roughly from I-270 east to Wilson Road, and from Fisher Road south to railroad tracks near the casino site at the former Delphi plant.

And with property owners' approval, businesses in the township portion of the area would impose a 2.5 percent income tax that would be dedicated largely to economic-development projects within the zone.

The trustees are expected to approve the measure tonight; City Council gets it Monday. It's all contingent on Ohio voters approving state Issue 2 on Tuesday, which would authorize moving the casino site from the Arena District to the old Delphi plant on Georgesville Road.
Logged
The Principle of Subsidiarity
Repeal the 17th Amendment

"peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." - Th. Jefferson

Oh yea... Run Paul Run!
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2010, 05:01:07 AM »
Vince the Fox Offline
Trusted Allies
CTH Tutor

*
Reputation: +2/-0
Posts: 342




Ignore

Just wondering... Why when an Indian buys some land... land that wasn't Reservation land... It now becomes "Sacred land" and they can build a casino....Just a thought.
Logged
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2010, 12:20:23 PM »
Vocal Observer Offline
Verified Member
CTH Associate Professor

*****
Reputation: +18/-0
Posts: 1971




Ignore

Are you implying that a double standard exists in society? Shocked

I guess people don't mind when they are the beneficiaries.
Logged
The Principle of Subsidiarity
Repeal the 17th Amendment

"peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none." - Th. Jefferson

Oh yea... Run Paul Run!
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2010, 05:20:02 AM »
Vince the Fox Offline
Trusted Allies
CTH Tutor

*
Reputation: +2/-0
Posts: 342




Ignore

Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services | Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:00 am | Comments

Font Size: Default font size Larger font size PHOENIX - The state House voted Wednesday to let Glendale annex land owned by the Tohono O'odham Nation, a move that would thwart the tribe's ability to construct a casino there.

The 31-26 vote came after several lawmakers complained the tribe acted in an underhanded way when it bought the property years ago under an assumed name and only last year made public its true ownership, and its intent to build a casino, hotel complex and shopping center on 135 acres near the Arizona Cardinals stadium.

"They purposely used a subversive process, an under-the-radar process," said Rep. Rick Murphy, R-Glendale.

Rep. Michele Reagan, R-Scottsdale, pointed out all the tribes, including the Tohono O'odham, urged voters in 2002 to approve their initiative to give Indians the exclusive right to conduct casino gaming.

Their argument, Reagan said, was that this would "keep gaming out of neighborhoods."

"But at that same time, the tribe was shopping for lands to put their casino in a neighborhood," she said. "I just think it was deceitful to voters."

The measure now goes to the Senate. Gov. Jan Brewer, who lives in Glendale, already is on record as wanting to block the casino
Logged
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines